Binary Capital LLC was hit by a sexual harassment scandal when a former employee sued the company for harassing and defaming her after she resigned from the venture capital firm. Revelations were also made that co-founder Justin Caldbeck made unwelcome sexual advances toward female startup founders.
According to the lawsuit against the firm, the allegations go much deeper than previously known. As mentioned in Bloomberg, Ann Lai, who was a principal at the San Francisco-based firm until May 2016, claims further incidents of bad behavior by Binary Capital’s founders, Justin Caldbeck and Jonathan Teo, in a new filing. In the ongoing lawsuit, Lai lleges that the two founders “demanded headshots of female job applicants to evaluate their attractiveness. They discussed holding a no-clothes retreat for employees, she said. They eventually held a poolside event at a Napa hotel, where attendees wore bathing suits, and an underage intern was given alcohol, according to the complaint.”
Lai, who earned three degrees from Harvard University before spending about a year at Binary Capital, said she left because of its “sexist and sexual environment,” according to the suit.
Following the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the Times Up movement, Hollywood’s Screen Actors Guild called for the ban on auditions in private hotel rooms and residences, where many reported incidents of sexual harassment and assault have occurred.
“To help protect members from potential harassment and exploitation, SAG-AFTRA released today a Guideline that calls for an end to the practice of holding professional meetings in private hotel rooms or residences,” the group said in a statement.
As mentioned in The Wrap, the change comes after accusations of decades of sexual harassment and assault have been lodged against Weinstein. The film producer has been accused by nearly 90 women in various cities around the world, though he has consistently denied any nonconsensual sex.
The industry has been scrambling to put systems in place to help curtail the abuses of power by men. Women in the industry, such as Shonda Rhimes, Ava DuVernay and Natalie Portman, started a legal defense fund in conjunction with the #TimesUp movement to fight sexual assault, harassment, discrimination and abuses of power in the workplace.
As mentioned in Reuters, the settlement states Uber also agreed to reforms to its system for compensation, reviews and promotions.
The settlement compensates for financial and emotional harm to about 285 women and 135 men of color.
On Oct. 24, Roxana del Toro Lopez and Ana Medina, who described themselves as Latina software engineers, filed an action in the Superior Court, followed by another three days later in the district court alleging classwide gender and race discrimination.
The lawsuit said Uber’s employee ranking system was “not based on valid and reliable performance measures” and favored men and white or Asian employees. As a result they lost out on earnings, promotions and benefits, they added.
A former employee for the Atlanta Hawks filed a lawsuit against the team, accusing them of engaging in a pattern of discrimination against white employees.
According to the Washington Post, Margo Kline worked as a community development coordinator for the team and was fired in March 2017 after five years with the Hawks. She subsequently filed a charge of race discrimination and sex discrimination and retaliation with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which in December gave her a notice of a right to sue.
In her lawsuit, Kline singled out her supervisor, Hawks external affairs director David Lee, who she described as “a black male,” for promoting “a culture of discrimination against white individuals” and accused Lee of the following:
- “Being dismissive and exclusionary” toward white employees, particularly white women.
- “Making jokes about white culture.”
- “Making it clear that he wanted to hire black individuals” and not “white females” when vacancies arose in his department.
- “Expecting and requiring more of white individuals, especially white females,” than black employees under his supervision.
- “Promoting and hiring less qualified black individuals” over white people, particularly white women.
- Being more apt to “offer raises and promotions” to black employees.
Kline asked for punitive damages, recompense for her fees related to her legal action and a jury trial.
In recent years, the fight for raising the minimum wage has made progress, but unfortunately “wage laws are poorly enforced, with workers often unable to recover back pay even after the government rules in their favor,” reveals Politico after a nine-month investigation.
According to Politico “workers are so lightly protected that six states have no investigators to handle minimum-wage violations, while 26 additional states have fewer than 10 investigators.” Given the limited resources and widespread issue most cases go unreported with “an estimated $15 billion in desperately needed income for workers with lowest wages,” which goes to the pockets of shady bosses instead.
Even if the system is in the worker’s favor and orders their employer to pay back what they are owed, 41 percent of those wages aren’t recovered, according to the survey of 15 states.
“Wages are far too low to begin with, so when money is stolen right out of workers’ paychecks, we have to have effective tools in place to get that money back,” Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown said in a statement to Politico. “But wage theft is just one part of the problem that hard work simply doesn’t pay off the way it should. And that’s true for all workers — whether they punch a time clock, swipe a badge, make a salary or earns tips — they’re working too hard for too little.”
A jury has ordered that the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) pay $13 million to Dr. Pinter-Brown for allegedly retaliating against her after complaining of discrimination and harassment, ultimately leading to her resignation.
According to PR Newswire, Dr. Pinter-Brown began working at UCLA Medical Center in 2005 as the director of the UCLA lymphoma program. Throughout her entire tenure at UCLA, she consistently received exemplary peer reviews, awards, and accolades. Until 2013, she was one of only two senior female faculty members in the program.
Pinter-Brown filed verbal and written complaints, but UCLA made no significant efforts to address the problem. She eventually resigned from her position at UCLA in 2015.
On February 15, a Los Angeles jury found in favor of Dr. Pinter-Brown’s claims of gender discrimination and gender retaliation, ordering UCLA to pay her $3,011,671 in loss of earnings and an additional $10,000,000 in damages for emotional distress, for a total verdict of $13,011,671.
“Teen Mom” former star Farrah Abraham has filed a $5 million lawsuit against MTV and the whole Teen Mom OG production, alleging that she was fired and “sex-shamed” and wrongfully terminated.
According to New York Daily News, Abraham stated her decade-long reign as a main cast member on “Teen Mom” and its spinoff “Teen Mom OG” came to a screeching halt last October after she was confronted at her Texas residence by producer Morgan J. Freeman.
“Freeman, alongside his production crew, harassed, humiliated, discriminated against, disrespected, ridiculed, degraded and sex shamed Ms. Abraham for her recent decision to pursue opportunities in the adult entertainment industry,” the lawsuit filed in federal court states.
Abraham claims the media giant failed to take appropriate action and should be found liable for negligence, breach of contract and retaliation.
Google didn’t violate labor laws by firing engineer James Damore for his controversial memo criticizing its diversity policies and “politically correct monoculture”, according to the US National Labor Relations Board.
As mentioned in Boomberg, the statements in James Damore’s 3,000-word memo “regarding biological differences between the sexes were so harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive” that they fell outside protections for collective action in the workplace, an associate general counsel for the National Labor Relations Board concluded.
When Damore was dismissed in August, he accused Google of violating the employee right to engage in “concerted activity” to address workplace issues, a category which the labor board has found can include forms of activism ranging from lawsuits to strikes to social media posts.
Most of Damore’s memo was probably protected under the law, the labor board’s attorney, Jayme Sophir, stated in a memo. But Sophir went on to find that Google discharged Damore only for his “discriminatory statements,” which aren’t shielded by labor law.
San Francisco’s “Lactation in the Workplace” Ordinance has increased protections for nursing mothers in San Francisco.
While the California Labor Code and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act already require most employers to make reasonable efforts to provide lactation breaks and locations to nursing mothers, this Ordinance goes further than existing law in:
- requiring an employer to provide a reasonable amount of break time to accommodate an employee desiring to express breast milk for the employee’s child, and
- providing specific requirements for lactation areas, employer policies, and record keeping.
The Ordinance applies to all employers in San Francisco unless they can establish that compliance would impose an undue hardship.
The Ordinance requires employers to provide a lactation area for a nursing mother that is clean and free of hazardous materials, contains a chair and surface space for a breast pump (e.g., a table or counter), and has access to electricity. The lactation area may be available for non-lactation uses, but:
- an employee’s lactation breaks must take precedence over other uses
- the employer must provide notice to other employees of the room’s primary function
Employers in multi-tenant buildings that cannot accommodate the employee within the employer’s workspace may also meet the lactation location requirements by designating a room or space that is shared with other tenants in the building.
If your employer is not providing lactation accommodation in the workplace, please contact the attorneys at the California Employment Law Group today for a consultation with an experienced employment lawyer who will clearly explain your rights and options under the law.
Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 621 into law, which modifies portions of California Labor Code Section 515.8 to facilitate the implementation of the salary test used to determine the exempt employee status of private school teachers.
The SB 621 law does three things:
- Establishes a pro-rated salary threshold for part-time teachers. Effective January 1, 2018, part-time private school teachers can be deemed exempt employees if – in addition to satisfying all other requirements of Labor Code Section 515.8 – they meet a pro-rated minimum salary threshold.
- Permits private school administrators to use public school data from the prior year to calculate the salary threshold determinations. Private schools typically execute contracts with teachers in advance of a new school year, and school administrators must create budgets well before making such commitments. During the budgeting process it may be difficult – and in some cases, impossible – to obtain public school teacher salary data for a coming school year. To cut private school administrators some needed slack, SB 621 permits salary data in effect “for up to 12 months prior to the start of the school year,” to be used when making the necessary calculations.
- Clarifies that the word “county” in the subsection of Labor Code Section 515.8 dealing with the calculation of the minimum salary threshold, refers to county offices of education.
If you think your work rights have been violated, please contact the attorneys at the California Employment Law Group today for a consultation with an experienced employment lawyer who will clearly explain your rights and options under the law.